SCIENCE SESSION DESCRIPTION
  • Title: Rolling Out the Reasons for Engaging in Scientific Argumentation
  • Session Purpose/Overview: This session focuses on participants engaging in strategies for empowering teachers to plan and deliver high-quality science instruction. Participants will use principles grounded in Negotiating Science: The Critical Role of Argument in Student Inquiry by Brian Hand et al and integrate the Claims-Evidence-Reasoning model to increase educator effectiveness and achievement for all students.
  • Session Description: This session will introduce participants to the Claims-Evidence-Reasoning model for argument in K-12 science education and the Science Writing Heuristic.
  • Session Objectives: Participants will…
    • Explore the elements associated with engaging in argument from evidence
    • Engage in activities that apply the Claims-Evidence-Reasoning model and Science Writing Heuristic
    • Link activities to Professional Teaching Standards, NC Science Essential Standards, Common Core Literacy Standards, A Framework for K-12 Science Education, and NC’s Home Base resources.
  • Session Outcome: After the session, participants will be able to work with their LEA leadership team to improve current instructional resources by embedding activities that apply the Claims-Evidence-Reasoning model and Science Writing Heuristic.

Pre-Work: View the archived NSTA Webinar "Questions, Claims, and Evidence: The Important Place of Argument in Science Writing" at
http://learningcenter.nsta.org/products/symposia_seminars/NSTA/webseminar18.aspx

Presentation PowerPoint


Digital Disclaimer:
The digital tools used during this institute have been helpful to some educators across the state. However, due to the rapidly changing digital environment, NCDPI does not represent nor endorse that these tools are the exclusive digital tools for the purposes outlined during this institute.
Time
Topic
Resources
0:00-0:05
Welcome/Introductions
Slides 1-4
0:05-0:15
Warm-up/Focus & Review of Pre-work
“How was your Weekend?”
Slides 5-6
Post-It Notes
0:15-0:20
Elaborate on the model of claims, evidence and reasoning connect the Pre-work assignment
Slides 7-11
Handout#1_ProbeExplanation(front)

Handout#1_Feedback(back)

0:20-0:40
Blocks Activity
  • Floating and Sinking Probe (Vol 2, p.41); pre-populating the SWH template in Slide 13
  • Conduct Experiment
  • Complete claim, evidence and reasoning portions of template
Slides 12-14
Handout#2_SWH template

Container with 4 blocks and water; water pitcher for each site
0:40-0:50
Stay/Stray Activity to complete “Other people say” portion of template
Slides 15-16
Handout#3_Solids and Holes_ Teacher Notes (Workshop use only)
Participant Internet Access
0:50-0:80
Transfer
Connect to Essential Standards, NCPTS, Home Base resources, Dufour Questions(PLCs), UDL, CC Literacy Standards & Math Practices, Framework Practices
Slides 17-25
Resource_ Connecting to Serve All Quick Reference_SI2012

Handout#4_Cl-Ev-R Combinations of Practices Sheet (Front)


Handout#4_VennDiagram(Back)

0:80-0:90
Reflections:
  • How can the Cl-Ev-R model and SWH be used to facilitate student learning? Padlet
  • Evaluation
Slides 26-28
Internet Access for Padlet and Evaluation
Resource book provided to participants: Negotiating Science-The Critical Role of Argument in Student Inquiry by Brian Hand et al